레이블이 Web TV인 게시물을 표시합니다. 모든 게시물 표시
레이블이 Web TV인 게시물을 표시합니다. 모든 게시물 표시

2014년 1월 15일 수요일

Rebooting webOS: how LG rethought the smart TV


Things never went very well for webOS. Between its blockbuster launch at CES in 2009 and its relaunch on LG's smart TVs today lies a history of failed ambitionsand a lost history of never-released products. When LG acquired parts of webOS in February of last year, we had two questions: what exactly did LG plan to do, andwhy did it need webOS to do it? We finally have answers to both of those questions, and they're unsurprisingly simple and straightforward. webOS turned out to be a flexible platform that could be repurposed for the TV and — more importantly — the team behind it had a vision for how a smart TV should work.
On the eve of LG's launch, I sat down with webOS’s head of product management and design, Itai Vonshak, as well as Colin Zhao, director of product management for LG's Silicon Valley Lab. As they demoed LG's new interface to me, I was by turns intrigued, bemused, and doubtful that it was up to the task of convincing people that it would be worth buying a new TV for. Most of all, I was impressed by the clarity of vision behind the new interface. For better or worse, webOS has an opinion about how smart TVs should treat their users, and by all appearances that opinion is executed very, very well. LG is better known for pretty schizophrenic Android skins on its smartphones, so to see the company produce something this coherent was a shock.

Over half of LG's TVs next year will run webOS TV, so it's a significant effort but LG isn't quite all-in yet. Zhao says that "the war cry that we started with was to 'make TV simple again.'" To pull it off, webOS smart TVs start with the metaphor of the line. Instead of a grid of apps, everything you want to do is arrayed horizontally. "There's nothing simpler than understanding a line," Vonshak says. "You have your past things, you have your present, and you the future."

The key difference between this and other smart TVs is that LG doesn't create a distinction between smart TV apps and regular TV and inputs. They're all just cards. "We wanted unity. Everything is the same, be it your Xbox, your source, or some apps," says Vonshak. "If you're watching Netflix and want to switch to see what's happening in a game, then go back to YouTube, it should be all the same thing." In fact, LG's TVs can automatically identify new inputs and label and name them for you — so if you plug in a PS4, it will appear as a PS4 card, not just "HDMI 2."
The "present" is the home screen, which appears as an overlay on top of whatever you're watching instead of kicking you off to a separate screen with a grid of apps. The line gives you a list of your favorite apps — stuff like Hulu Plus, Netflix, YouTube, and so on — along with a card that represents your last app and another called "Today" that can make content recommendations.
Lg_webos_2

You navigate with LG's motion-enabled remote control and a small on-screen cursor. If you want to watch something that isn't on your home screen, you can select overflow buttons on the left or the right. The left is the "Past," which gives you a history of your last apps or channels in a big list of cards. On the right are apps — and LG will have an app store to fill that list up — and as you hover over each of them, app makers can give you a big, full-screen preview to entice you to click.
Of course, there are settings and even a notification system for apps to alert you about new episodes and the like, but the core of the webOS experience on LG's smart TVs boils down to that single line of cards and apps. It's very restrained, but with flourishes of animations in the transition that are fast enough to not be overbearing and provide just a little bit of whimsy. "A lot of the challenge that comes with flat design is that it gets really boring," says Vonshak. "We have a lot of tension between different parts of the design. There's strong lines, and then they move sort of like jelly, in an unexpected way."
There's one place where the whimsy might be too much — or at least too easy to compare to Microsoft Bob. It's the "Bean Bird," which is part of LG's "Cinematic Setup." It walks users through the first-use experience: setting up time zones and Wi-Fi and the like. Flitting about on the screen, Bean Bird is meant to encourage users to actually finish their smart TV setup — too many just don't bother, Vonshak says, and there's little point in spending the extra money on a smart TV if you don't take advantage of its features.
Lg-webos-recent-theverge-1_1020
To tell the truth, I found Bean Bird a little charming — but the approach is definitely an easy target for snark, and if LG isn't judicious in using the little guy (or gal?), Bean Bird will earn a well-deserved place alongside Clippy. Watching the bird wave a surrender flag to protest your attempt to skip the Wi-Fi setup once is amusing — having to live with it all the time would be the exact opposite. Luckily, LG tells me that it's just a first-use experience. 
Still, once you get into actually using the webOS interface on LG's smart TVs, you'll be struck by the consistency of the experience. Vonshak says that the design was inspired by the same "war cry" of making TV simple. "The strong colors, and the lines, really come from old TVs and how even the 'no signal' used to look," Vonshak says. "We really found that as a great inspiration source to how to focus specifically on content, on TV itself, and what that thing is."
Lg-webos-tv-theverge-1_560
TV first is a good philosophy, but creating (and branding) the interface with webOS doesn't necessarily seem, well, necessary. Why webOS? Vonshak clearly still has faith in the mission of the open web. "We really believe that the web is the right path forward and the web will win because it's the right ecosystem," he says. Missionary zeal aside, using HTML (and Enyo) makes very good sense for smart TVs — many of the core apps that consumers demand are already available in HTML on the web itself, so it's relatively trivial to get them working on LG's smart TVs.
Earlier I called webOS on smart TVs "a smaller ambition for a bigger screen" and after seeing how webOS works now, that assessment still stands. LG hasn't solved any of the truly thorny problems in the living room. But executing well on a smaller ambition is still to be commended — and my initial impression is that LG may have pulled it off. webOS will never achieve the goals its original creators had set for it. And, to be honest, it won't generate massive consumer demand for LG's TVs. But what it could do is make your next smart TV a little less painful to use. Five years ago at this very show, webOS dreamt big. After seeing those dreams burn in up a conflagration of missed opportunities, even that small victory is a pleasant surprise.

2013년 8월 5일 월요일

10 Things You Need To Know About Google's New Chromecast



Google's push for the living room got a fuel injection yesterday when the company revealed its Chromecast streaming stick. The compact dongle can push Web video, music and pics from the cloud to your television, but the really big deal is that you can control it all from a range of devices for a dirt-cheap price—a $35 price tag that could tip the scales for fence-sitters. 
Here's what you most need to know about the little streaming stick that looks poised to make big waves:
(1) Chromecast really is tiny:The stick is just three inches long, with a micro USB port on one end and a HDMI plug on the other. So it won't take up precious space in an entertainment center. 
(2) It has a power cord: That micro USB port is for power; you'll need to run a USB cable from the Chromecast to the included power adapter or a USB port on your TV. So the unit isn't a fully self-contained gadget that will hide neatly and completely behind a TV. It's worth noting for anyone who plans to carry it around to friends' houses, meetings or other places where connected TVs aren't available. 
(3) There's no learning curve: Google repeatedly emphasized that there's nothing new to learn and no configuration to fuss with in Chromecast. It's fully controllable from iPhones, Android phones and laptops—in other words, a variety of gadgets that lots of people already own. Those can manage playback, pause, skip and even volume without any real setup or need to learn new sets of controls.
(4) Chromecast is largely platform agnostic: You can control Chromecast from Android phones or tablets (version 2.3 or above), iOS devices (6.0 or higher), and computers with Chrome for Mac (Mac OS 10.7+) or Chrome for Windows (Windows 7+), as well as the Chromebook Pixel. Support for other Chromebooks is in the works. 
That agnosticism extends beyond simple control of the Chromecast. You can also resume watching, say, a Netflix movie on your mobile—whatever it is—from the precise moment where you left off on the TV, and vice versa. 
(5) It's cloud-only: Unlike Apple's AirPlay, Chromecast does not involve flinging saved files from a phone, tablet or laptop to the television. Just tap a button inside a compatible site or mobile app, like YouTube, and the device grabs the same clips, songs and pics from the cloud. The upside is that this won't kill your mobile's battery, and you can keep using your device without causing the stream to stutter or crash.
The downside is that if you have a big media library saved on, say, your PC, you'd presumably first have to upload it YouTube or another compatible site before you can play it through your TV—at least for now. Google's new Googlecast Software Developer Kit could change all that, though. Now that developers can make existing and future apps work with Chromecast, it's not hard to imagine some crafty app maker figuring out how to pull in local files too. (Yeah, I'm looking at you, Plex.)
[UPDATE: A workaround has been found. If a user opens a local video and plays it in Chrome, in most cases, it should cast to the Chromecast. This doesn't appear to be intended functionality, but people have been reporting some success.] 
(6) Compatible streaming sources are limited now, but sure to grow: The list of current and future offerings cover only a few major sites, including YouTube, Netflix, Google Music, Pandora and Google Plus photos. In time, though, there are sure to be others, thanks to the Googlecast SDK. (For a list of resources, click here.)
(7) If your media plays in a Chrome browser, it will play via Chromecast (for the most part): You don't have to wait for specific apps to support it. The Chrome browser powers the device, and it's capable of tossing practically anything from your laptop to Chromecast on your TV (though Silverlight and Quicktime videos need not apply, notes Wired). Hulu, Rdio, and HBO Go reportedly work this way; so do Flickr photos and browser-based online presentations. 
(8) If you're hoping Chromecast will play nice with DRM-protected iTunes files, well, stop: This is not likely. At all. iTunes DRM (digital rights management) is fierce, and it has foiled countless other developers who'd like nothing better than to let their users enjoy iTunes videos.
Things get even more complicated when you consider Chromecast's cloud-only modus operandi, since shows you buy or rent from iTunes usually come via download. Although Apple does allow some streaming, it's mostly aimed at other iOS or OS X devices. It's not like you can stream all of your iTunes media to any device with a browser. These details are daunting enough, but with the bad blood between Google and Apple, Chromecast has next to no chance of overcoming any of these issues. 
(9) Consumers are already swarming in: The Google Play store has sold out of Chromecasts, with the earliest ship date showing August 7 (as of this writing). Amazon briefly had it, but then also sold out. At this time, Best Buy online is the only Internet retailer I found that has inventory, and here too, it's very likely to sell out quickly.
[UPDATE July 25, 2013: BestBuy.com has sold out. UPDATE 2: BestBuy.com showed more stock, but seems to be out again. Clearly inventory levels are fluctuating, so if you're interested, you may want to check the page periodically.] 
At $35, it's likely that many customers aren't just buying one—they're probably picking up piles of them, as Google recommended, for use on every TV in their house. The takeaway: If you want Chromecast and you spot it online, grab it. Grab it now. 
(10) The free Netflix promotion applies to everyone [see update below]: Every product purchase comes with three months of Netflix for free. This is not some restricted offer for new customers only, but a valid promotion for both new and existing subscribers. (I confirmed this directly with Netflix.) If you factor that in, the already meager price of the Chromecast drops even lower still—to the tune of $11. 
[UPDATE: The Los Angeles Times reports that, due to overwhelming demand,the Netflix deal has been terminated. Presumably, orders that came in prior to the decision will still be eligible, but if we get confirmation to the contrary, we will update this post.]

The Bottom Line

Users looking for TV streaming devices don't lack choices. But so far, no single company has been able to deliver quite this combination of promised ease-of-use and cross-platform compatibility at a rock-bottom price. 
Roku comes close, but it doesn't integrate with mobile platforms very well—apart from having a remote control app—and its least expensive unit, the Roku LT, is more expensive ($50) and can't handle HD. The Roku 2 XD can, but it costs $80. Interestingly, the company launched its own streaming stick last year, which plays 1080p HD, but at a high cost of $100. And it's not easy to view a simple YouTube video on a Roku.
That's not to say that Chromecast can satisfy every one of your streaming needs. As mentioned, Chromecast can't play locally stored media files (at least not out of the box, though there are workarounds), and it will likely never play iTunes movies. But at this price, it's tough to criticize it. 
This isn't the first time Google has dabbled with connecting TVs. Remember Google TV and the Nexus Q? Maybe third time's the charm, because by the looks of it, the Chromecast seems like the company's best chance for a hit. 
To see the device in action, check out Google's promotional video below.

Image by Madeleine Weiss for ReadWrite

2013년 7월 10일 수요일

WebTV Comes To An End At Last


WebTV Comes To An End At Last
This September, an Internet legacy will be Error 404: WebTV will be dead.
I know what you're thinking: WebTV was still alive?
Indeed it was, but this mainstay of the very early days of the World Wide Web will be shut down after an 17-year run, according to its owners, Microsoft, which had re-branded the service as MSN TV in 2001.
The thin-client Internet browsing service, which provided Internet access via television sets, will be shuttered on September 30. Microsoft revealed the news in an e-mail to subscribers and an FAQ posted to its Web site.
WebTV (later called MSN TV) started in 1996 with the goal to bring new people "online" and to give those already online an easy, hassle-free means of accessing the internet from the comfort of their homes. Later, MSN TV 2 was released with vastly greater power and features. Since then, the web has continued to evolve at a breathtaking pace, and there are many new ways to access the internet. Accordingly, we have made the difficult decision to end the MSN TV service on September 30th, 2013. We are working with our customers to ensure the transition is as seamless as possible.
Users of the service, now dubbed MSN TV 2, will be able to access some of their content online using Microsoft's existing cloud services. Favorites saved in the television web browser will be accessible via SkyDrive. E-mails and contact information will be available through Outlook.com.
Photos will also be available on SkyDrive, but users will need to run through a few steps to make sure the photos will be carried over.
All of this, of course, is contingent on users having Microsoft accounts, which is urged in the FAQ documentation.
At its launch in 1996, WebTV was actually a very forward-thinking way to get Internet access to users in a marketplace where PCs were nowhere near real penetration in the home. Use of the Internet, particularly the Web, exploded in the mid-1990s, after the National Science Foundation allowed commercial use of Web sites. But the expense of PCs in those days, not to mention the scarcity of dial-up services, made Internet use in the home a patchy affair.
WebTV, with its integrated dial-up and a simple-to-use set-top box, made Web surfing at home a relatively painless process. Emphasis on the relatively:

For all its flaws, WebTV and MSN TV did bring manage to introduce a fair amount of users to the mysterious world of the Internet, and as such, deserves a little show of love. Remember the days of dial-up Internet fondly, for it was these brave pioneers that would one day bring us LOLcats.
Summary; The once-pioneering Internet service was innovative and yet oh so mockable.